New York Legislation Targets ‘Ghost Job’ Advertisements

On June 2, 2026, New York State lawmakers passed Senate Bill S8877 (the “Bill”), a bill requiring certain mandatory disclosures for printed and digital job postings by employers or third-party job posting entities. The purpose of the Bill is to address “ghost jobs,” which are jobs that are advertised without the intent to fill the position or no longer exist.

Key Takeaways

Under the Bill, employers with 100 or more employees and third-party job posting platforms must disclose the expected timeframe for hiring an individual for a posted position. A third-party job posting entity is defined as “a person or entity that is not the employer and that posts multiple job vacancies or listings on behalf of or independently of employers for job seekers to search and apply to job postings on one platform.” Specifically, the Bill would impose the following requirements:

  • If the employer intends to fill the position within 90 days, then the advertisement must state that it is for a current vacancy and include the date by which the employer intends to fill the position;
  • If the employer intends to fill the position more than 90 days from the date of advertising, then the advertisement must state that it is for a current vacancy and that the position will be filled “no sooner than” a specified date; and
  • If “there is no expectation that the job is to be filled,” then the advertisement must state that there is no current vacancy and the employer is seeking resumes for when positions become available.

The new mandatory language must appear in the covered job advertisements in bold, capital letters. In addition to the requirements stated above, once an advertised position has been filled, the employer must remove the listing within two weeks of the position being filled. Similarly, third-party job posting entities must remove the job posting within two weeks of the date that it knows or has reason to know that the job has been filled.

A violation would result in a $2,500 fine for each print publication or digital platform where the advertisement appears. The employer or third-party job posting entity must rectify the violation within 30 days and failure to implement corrections within the specified time period will result in the penalty increasing to $5,000. Afterwards, the fine amount doubles for every subsequent 30-day period of noncompliance.

Next Steps

The Bill was passed by the New York Senate and Assembly, and the legislation is currently awaiting action from Governor Kathy Hochul. If signed into law, the Bill would impact all New York employers with 100 or more employees effective immediately. While it is still unclear, we anticipate that if enacted, the Bill could have an impact on the mandatory advertisements in connection with the PERM labor certification process. We will continue to monitor the developments on this Bill and recommend that employers evaluate job-posting practices in anticipation of potential compliance obligations in the meantime.

For additional information, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.


Danisa Foote

DHS Issues Proposed Rule to Increase Fees for Citizenship Applications

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed a new rule to significantly increase the processing fees for Form N-400, Application for Naturalization and Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings. DHS’s last comprehensive adjustment to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) fee schedule that impacted these types of applications occurred took effect on April 1, 2024.

Summary of Changes

  • Form N-336: Increases the fee from $830 to $1475 for paper filings and from $780 to $1425 for online filings
  • Form N-400: Increases the fee from $760 to $1330 for paper filings and from $710 to $1280 for online filings
  • Reduced Fee: Eliminates the $380 reduced fee option for individuals whose household income is less than or equal to 400 of the of the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG)
  • Waivers: Eliminates eligibility for fee waivers
  • Exemptions: Current and former armed members of the armed forces will remain exempt

Why Now?

DHS’s rationale for significantly increasing Form N-400 fees and eliminating waivers and reduced fee options, centers on a strict “beneficiary-pays” model to achieve full cost recovery for USCIS, an agency that operates primarily on fee revenue rather than congressional funding. DHS calculates that the existing filing fees will fall short of covering USCIS’s actual costs of adjudicating naturalization applications following significant changes to national security vetting processes mandated by multiple Executive Orders signed in 2025. Specifically, the implementation of enhanced screening protocols—including expanded biographical data cross-checks, deeper continuous vetting across federal databases, and more rigorous fraud detection systems—has substantially driven up the administrative costs per application. DHS seeks to ensure that it can meet the heightened vetting obligations and prevent backlogs without drawing resources from other areas and/or operating at a deficit.

What to Expect Next

The proposed rule is open for public comment through August 24, 2026. Following review of the submitted comments, DHS may revise terms prior to issuing a final rule.  The current fees for N-400 and N-336 remain in effect and fee waivers and reduced-fee options continue to be available.

What This Means for Employers

While not required, many employers opt to assist their lawful permanent resident employees with naturalization applications. For employers moving employees to US Citizenship status, this is a significant change to cost. Recommendations for employers include:

  • Prioritize the preparation and filing any naturalization applications currently under consideration.
  • Adjust budgets for applications and make appropriate adjustments.
  • Review or update company policies with regard to assistance with naturalization applications and/or payment of related government filing fees.


Amy McCoy

July 2026 Visa Bulletin Released: What Employers Need to Know

The Dept. of State released the July 2026 Visa Bulletin and USCIS has confirmed that they will continue to accept employment-based Adjustment of Status applications under the Final Action Dates chart for July. Key updates in the July Visa Bulletin for Final Action Dates are as follows:

  • EB-1 India will retrogress by two months to October 15, 2022.
  • EB-1 China will advance by two months to June 1, 2023.
  • EB-3 India will advance by two weeks to January 1, 2014.
  • EB-3 China will advance by approximately four and half months to December 22, 2021.
  • EB-3 Worldwide will advance by two months to August 1, 2024.

EB-2 India and EB-5 India will remain unavailable for the remainder of the fiscal year, which ends September 30, 2026. U.S. Consular posts cannot issue immigrant visas and USCIS cannot accept or approve Adjustment of Status (AOS) applications for EB-2 India or EB-5 India applicants through September 30, 2026. The annual limits for immigrant visa availability will reset at the start of the USCIS fiscal year which commences on October 1, 2026.

The Dept. of State also notes that demand and increased immigrant visa number usage may make it necessary to retrogress or update several employment-based categories to unavailable before the fiscal year ends on September 30, 2026. Most notably, EB-1 India has retrogressed and may face further retrogression or even temporary unavailability if demand continues. Additionally, the Dept. of State has warned that EB-2 China and EB-3 Philippines could experience retrogression or unavailability in the coming months to keep visa allocation within annual limits.

EMPLOYMENT-BASED (EB) PRIORITY DATE SUMMARY FOR FINAL ACTION DATES 

USCIS confirmed that it will honor the Final Action Dates chart for purposes of eligibility to file an Adjustment of Status application. The Final Action Dates are as follows:

EB-1, First Preference Category

  • EB-1 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico, and Philippines) will remain current.
  • EB-1 China will advance by two months to June 1, 2023.
  • EB-1 India will retrogress by two months to October 15, 2022.

EB-2, Second Preference Category

  • EB-2 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico, and Philippines) will remain current.
  • EB-2 China will maintain a filing cutoff of September 1, 2021.
  • EB-2 India will be unavailable through September 30, 2026.

EB-3, Third Preference Category (Professional and Skilled Workers)

  • EB-3 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, and Mexico) will advance by two months to August 1, 2024.
  • EB-3 China will advance by approximately four and half months to December 22, 2021.
  • EB-3 India will advance by two weeks to January 1, 2014.
  • EB-3 Philippines will remain at August 1, 2023.

Other Workers

  • Other Workers (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, and Mexico) will advance by one month to March 1, 2022.
  • Philippines will advance by one month to December 1, 2021.
  • China will maintain a cutoff date of April 1, 2019 and India will advance by two weeks January 1, 2014.

EB-5: Fifth Preference Category (Immigrant Investors)

  • For the EB-5 Unreserved categories (C5, T5, I5, and R5), China will advance by approximately ten weeks to December 1, 2016 and India will be unavailable through September 30, 2026. All other countries will remain current.
  • The EB-5 “Set-Aside” categories (Rural, High Unemployment, and Infrastructure) will remain current.

Individuals with a priority date that is before the published cut-off date may file an Adjustment of Status application based on the dates outlined above.

WHAT SHOULD EMPLOYERS EXPECT?  

In the July Visa Bulletin,  the Dept. of State continues to caution that as applicant demand increases or policies such as the Presidential Proclamation 10949 and Presidential Proclamation 10998 change, retrogression or unavailability may be required later in the fiscal year throughout several employment-based categories to remain within annual limits. The situation will be continually monitored and any necessary adjustments will be made accordingly.

Due to high demand and number use for EB-1 India, Final Action Dates will retrogress by two months to maintain immigrant visa usage within FY 2026 annual limit. Further retrogression or updating the category to unavailable may be necessary in the coming months if the annual limit in the EB-1 India category is reached before the fiscal year ends.

The annual limit for EB-2 India and EB-5 India has been met for Fiscal Year 2026 and as such, these categories will remain unavailable through September 30, 2026. The Dept. of State indicates that the October Final Action Dates chart for EB-2 India will likely advance to at least the Final Action Date announced in the May 2026 Visa Bulletin, (July 15, 2014), and that EB-5 India will likely advance to at least the Final Action Date reflected in the June Visa Bulletin (May 1, 2022). However, actual date movement for these categories will be dependent on applicant demand and Fiscal Year 2027 annual limits for employment-based preference categories.

The Dept. of State warns that sufficient demand and increased number use by applicants chargeable to EB-2 China and EB-3 Philippines may make it necessary to retrogress the Final Action Dates or make these categories unavailable in the coming months to hold number use within the FY 2026 annual limit.

Employers sponsoring foreign national employees for permanent residence should anticipate continued delays and uncertainty in the employment-based green card process, particularly for employees born in India, China and the Philippines. Due to high demand and annual visa number limitations, the Dept. of State has retrogressed certain categories and made others unavailable for the remainder of the Fiscal Year 2026. Employers should plan for longer processing timelines, maintain valid nonimmigrant work authorization for affected employees where possible, and expect that green card adjudications may be delayed until additional visa numbers become available in Fiscal Year 2027.

For additional information, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.


Inez Macedonio


This alert is provided as general information for clients and friends of Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, LLP. It does not constitute, and should not be construed as, legal advice.  The contents of this alert may be considered attorney advertising in some states.  © 2026 Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, LLP

Sign-up for more alerts.

State Department Introduces $750 Premium B1/B2 Visa Interview Expedite: What B Visa Applicants Need to Know

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has published a temporary final rule on June 9, 2026 introducing an optional $750 premium fee to expedite interview scheduling for B-1/B-2 (business and tourism) visa applicants.

Key Timeline & Details

  • Effective Dates: This is a 6-month pilot program scheduled to last from July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026.
  • The Benefit: Eligible applicants can secure a consular interview appointment within 10 business days, subject to visa appointment and DOS resources available at the location selected.
  • Cost: $750 USD, which is a premium supplement paid in addition to the standard $185 Machine-Readable Visa (MRV) application fee.

How It Works

  • Applicants must complete their Form DS-160, pay the standard $185 fee, and first schedule a regular (non-expedited) interview date.
  • If the consular post is participating and has capacity, the applicant will then see an online option to upgrade to an expedited slot within 10 business days by paying the $750 fee.

Critical Limitations & Guardrails

  • No Guarantee of Approval: Paying the $750 premium fee only accelerates the appointment date. It does not influence the consular officer’s decision, guarantee visa issuance, or bypass any standard eligibility/screening requirements.
  • Adjudication Not Fast-Tracked: The fee does not speed up administrative processing. Any security or eligibility clearances will still take the standard amount of time.
  • Limited Availability: This service is not available globally. The State Department will list participating embassies and consulates on its travel.state.gov website, and slots will be strictly capped to prevent impacting regular appointment wait times.
  • Non-Refundable / Rigid: Failing to attend the expedited appointment or complete payment will result in the forfeiture of both the slot and the fee.

Rationale & Context

This pilot initiative aims to alleviate extreme visa interview backlogs—which currently exceed 12 months at several global consulates—and to manage massive impending travel demand for upcoming major events like the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

The existing no-fee expedited interview options (for urgent humanitarian, emergency, or U.S. government-referred travel) will remain active and unchanged at all consular posts.

At the end of 2026, the State Department will evaluate pilot data to decide whether to permanently adopt, adjust, or abandon this paid premium service.


Houman Afshar

Federal Courts Issue Significant Rulings Affecting Recent Immigration Policies

Two recent federal court decisions out of Rhode Island and Massachusetts have temporarily limited the implementation of several immigration-related policies adopted by the current Administration. While the decisions do not resolve the underlying legal disputes, they represent important developments for employers and foreign nationals with pending immigration matters.

Rhode Island Court Vacates USCIS Adjudication Pause

On June 5, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island issued a significant decision in Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island v. USCIS, holding that USCIS exceeded its statutory authority when it implemented policies that effectively halted adjudication of immigration benefit applications for nationals of designated “travel ban” countries. The court found that the policies violated both the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

The court vacated four USCIS policies that:

  • Suspended adjudication of many immigration benefit applications filed by nationals of designated countries;
  • Paused certain asylum-related adjudications;
  • Required re-review of previously approved immigration benefits; and
  • Directed adjudicators to treat an applicant’s country of origin as a significant negative discretionary factor.

As a result of the ruling, USCIS may resume adjudicating affected applications, including adjustment of status applications, employment authorization requests, naturalization applications, and certain asylum-related benefits. The decision does not require USCIS to approve any application, but it does require the agency to adjudicate cases under existing immigration law rather than pursuant to the vacated policies.

The Department of Justice is expected to appeal the decision, and employers should anticipate the possibility of further litigation or requests to stay the ruling while appellate review proceeds.

Massachusetts Court Strikes Down $100,000 H-1B Fee

In a separate and equally significant development, on June 8, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the Administration’s $100,000 supplemental fee on certain H-1B petitions is unlawful. The court concluded that the fee functioned as a tax rather than a permissible regulatory fee and therefore could not be imposed by the Executive Branch without authorization from Congress. As a result, the court vacated the fee requirement nationwide.

The ruling is particularly important for employers considering H-1B filings that had previously been subject to the $100,000 payment requirement, including petitions approved for consular notification. Unless the decision is stayed or reversed on appeal, USCIS and the Department of State lack authority to require payment of the supplemental fee before adjudicating or issuing qualifying H-1B visas.

While this decision provides immediate relief to many employers, it is unlikely to be the final word. The Department of Justice is expected to appeal and may seek a stay of the district court’s order while appellate proceedings are pending. The Department of State and USCIS have not yet issued implementation guidance and thus employers should continue to monitor developments closely before making filing decisions based solely on the ruling.


Kristen Heckman


This alert is provided as general information for clients and friends of Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, LLP. It does not constitute, and should not be construed as, legal advice.  The contents of this alert may be considered attorney advertising in some states.  © 2026 Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, LLP

Sign-up for more alerts.

June 2026 Immigration Visa Bulletin Released

The June 2026 Visa Bulletin issued by the Department of State (DOS) on May 4, 2026 and the USCIS Adjustment of Status Filing Chart, updated on May 14, 2026 confirmed that employment-based Adjustment of Status (AOS) applications will be accepted for processing pursuant to the Final Action Dates chart for June. The initial announcements indicated retrogression for both EB-1 India and EB-2 India, while EB-3 Professionals and Skilled Workers will advance for both China and India, as further detailed below.

Subsequently, on May 22, 2026, DOS announced that all of the available immigrant visas in the EB-2 India for fiscal year (FY) 2026 have been issued. As a result, the category was made unavailable through the end of the fiscal year. Accordingly, U.S. Embassies and Consulates cannot issue immigrant visas and USCIS cannot approve AOS applications for EB-2 India applicants through September 30, 2026. Annual limits will reset at the start of the fiscal year which commences on October 1, 2026.

EMPLOYMENT-BASED (EB) PRIORITY DATE SUMMARY FOR FINAL ACTION DATES 

USCIS confirmed that it will honor the Final Action Dates chart for purposes of eligibility to file an Adjustment of Status application. The Final Action Dates are as follows:

EB-1, First Preference Category

  • EB-1 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico, and Philippines) will remain current.
  • EB-1 China will hold steady at April 1, 2023.
  • EB-1 India will retrogress by three and half months to December 15, 2022.

EB-2, Second Preference Category

  • EB-2 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico, and Philippines) will remain current.
  • EB-2 China will maintain a filing cutoff of September 1, 2021.
  • EB-2 India, initially retrogressed to September 1, 2013 and subsequently made unavailable.

EB-3, Third Preference Category (Professional and Skilled Workers)

  • EB-3 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, and Mexico) will maintain a filing cutoff date of June 1, 2024.
  • EB-3 China will advance by six weeks to August 1, 2021.
  • EB-3 India will advance by one month to December 15, 2013.
  • EB-3 Philippines will remain at August 1, 2023.

Other Workers

  • Other Workers (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, and Mexico) will maintain a filing cutoff date of February 1, 2022.
  • Philippines will retrogress by three months to November 1, 2021.
  • China will advance by two months to April 1, 2019 and India will advance by one month to December 15, 2013.

EB-5: Fifth Preference Category (Immigrant Investors)

  • For the EB-5 Unreserved categories (C5, T5, I5, and R5), China will maintain a filing cutoff date of September 22, 2016 and India will hold steady at May 1, 2022. All other countries will remain current.
  • The EB-5 “Set-Aside” categories (Rural, High Unemployment, and Infrastructure) will remain current.

Individuals with a priority date that is before the published cut-off date may file an AOS application based on the dates outlined above.

WHAT SHOULD EMPLOYERS EXPECT?  

DOS has reiterated in the June 2026 Visa Bulletin, that reduced immigrant visa issuance for certain countries due to administration actions such as Presidential Proclamation 10949 and Presidential Proclamation 10998 has allowed for advancement of priority dates in some categories to allocate FY-2026 visa numbers. However, the DOS continues to caution that as demand increases or policies change, retrogression may occur later in the fiscal year to remain within annual limits.

DOS has indicated that high demand and number use for EB-1 and EB-2 India have made it necessary to retrogress the Final Action Dates for these categories to maintain immigrant visa usage within FY 2026 annual limit. DOS also noted that further retrogression or reflecting categories “unavailable”, may be necessary in the coming months if EB-1 India or EB-2 India numerical limits are reached before the fiscal year ends. Sufficient demand and increased number use by applicants chargeable to EB-2 China, EB-3 Philippines, and EB-5 India (unreserved) categories may make it necessary to retrogress the Final Action Dates or make these categories unavailable in the coming months to hold number use within the FY 2026 annual limit. The situation will be continually monitored and any necessary adjustments will be made accordingly.

In addition to ongoing visa number constraints, employers should be aware of significant policy developments affecting the AOS process. On May 22, 2026, USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, emphasizing that AOS is a discretionary benefit and characterizing it as an “extraordinary” form of relief rather than a routine alternative to immigration visa processing through a U.S. Consulate abroad. USCIS indicated that officers should exercise greater discretion when adjudicating AOS applications and consider whether consular processing may be the more appropriate avenue in individual cases.

Following substantial concerns within the immigration community, USCIS and administration officials provided additional clarification on May 29, 2026, confirming that there was no major change in policy and that only some applicants would be required to return to their home countries to apply for a green card. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson indicated that the policy memo was merely a reminder to officers of their discretionary authority which always existed on a case-by-case basis. Nevertheless, significant uncertainty remains regarding how the policy will be implemented in practice and whether adjudication standards will vary amount officers and field offices.

Given the combined impact of visa retrogression, visa number uncertainty, and evolving USCIS adjudication policies, employers should continue to proactively assess workforce immigration strategies. This includes maintaining underling nonimmigrant status where possible, timely filing extensions and amendment, evaluating travel and consular processing risks, and preparing potentially heightened Requests for Evidence or discretionary review during the AOS process. Early planning remains critical to minimizing disruptions to employee work authorization and long-term immigration sponsorship strategies.


Inez Macedonio

For additional information please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com. This alert contains general information only, and is not intended to provide legal advice.  Please contact immigration counsel for specific legal advice regarding your case.

EB-2 India Immigrant Visa Quota Reached: What Employers Need to Know

On May 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) announced that the quota for available immigrant visas in the Employment-Based Second Preference (EB-2) for applicants chargeable to India had been reached for fiscal year (FY) 2026. As a result, the EB-2 category was made unavailable through the end of the fiscal year.

U.S. consular posts cannot issue immigrant visas and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) cannot accept or approve Adjustment of Status (AOS) applications for EB-2 India applicants through September 30, 2026. The annual limits on immigrant visa availability will reset at the start of the USCIS fiscal year which commences on October 1, 2026.

Annual Immigrant Visa Quotas and Retrogression – Some Background

Pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) per fiscal year 140,000 employment-based immigrant visas (green cards) may be issued to qualified applicants, plus any unused visas from the family-based categories in the preceding year. The visas are distributed among five employment-based (EB) preference categories and then allocated by country of birth according to Congressionally-mandated per country quotas. The EB-2 preference category is reserved for professionals with advanced degrees or individuals with exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business. Individuals born in India are “chargeable” to the per-country quota established for India.

Each month, DOS reviews the number of immigrant visas used, the projected demand for visas, and the number of visas remaining under the annual numerical limit for the country and/or preference category. Visa retrogression occurs when the number of individuals seeking a green card exceeds the number of visas available in the applicable employment-based preference category.  A “cut-off date” is then set and published in the Visa Bulletin, the DOS’s monthly report on immigrant visa availability. A queue to apply for the green card ensues. Foreign national applicants are assigned a place in the queue based on their priority date, preference category, and country of birth.

For employment-based immigrants, the priority date is determined by the date that a PERM labor certification application is filed with the U.S. Department of Labor for the sponsored foreign national employee.  In cases where a PERM labor certification is not required (e.g., for EB-1 petitions and EB-2 National Interest Waiver petitions), the priority date is determined by the date that an I-140 immigrant petition is filed with USCIS.

In order for a foreign national to apply for a green card, their priority date must be available or “current” on the monthly Visa Bulletin.  An immigrant visa number is only available when the priority date is earlier than the cut-off date shown on the Visa Bulletin for the applicable preference category and country of birth.

What This Means for Employers

For employers with highly skilled employees with cases that fall in the EB-2 India category:

  • AOS Processing Paused: USCIS will not accept new AOS applications and will pause the processing of pending AOS applications through September 30, 2026.
  • Consular Processing Paused: U.S. consular posts abroad will not issue visas for the remainder of the fiscal year through September 30, 2026.
  • FY 2027 Reset: Annual limits will reset with the start of the new fiscal year (FY 2027) on October 1, 2026.
  • Resumed Issuance: After October 1, 2026, U.S. embassies and consulates abroad can resume issuing immigrant visas in this category to qualified applicants. Additionally, USCIS will resume accepting AOS applications and processing pending applications in accordance with the prospective October Visa Bulletin.

Important Work Authorization Note: Certain employees in H-1B status are eligible for a three (3) year extension of H-1B status beyond their visa maximum stay date while subject to visa retrogression pursuant to the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21). These employees are eligible for ongoing employment in the U.S. until a green card can be issued.


Amy McCoy

For additional information please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com. This alert contains general information only, and is not intended to provide legal advice.  Please contact immigration counsel for specific legal advice regarding your case.

Immigration Summer Travel Checklist 2026

Due to the changing immigration landscape in the United States and globally, there is a moderate level of risk with return to the U.S. following international travel at this time.  We strongly advise all nonimmigrant visa holders to be prepared to clearly explain their anticipated activities in the U.S. (i.e., work, school, internship, business meetings, etc.) and be sure that they align with the requested nonimmigrant visa category both when applying for a visa and when seeking admission to the U.S. upon return from international travel.

Travelers seeking reentry to the U.S. could experience enhanced screening upon arrival with an increased likelihood of electronic device search.  Travelers may wish to reduce the number of devices that they carry when traveling; review data stored on the device that may be confidential in nature and could be subject to search; consider what is posted on social media accounts. While travelers are not legally required to provide U.S. Custom and Border Protection (CBP) agents with their electronic device, they could be denied admission for failure to do so.

The current administration has implemented restrictions upon entry for nationals from certain countries which became effective soon after announced.  Currently full and partial restrictions are in place for nationals of 39 countries.

It’s important for all travelers to be extra cautious and alert to any changes that could impact their ability to travel.  Each traveler must maintain the appropriate documentation for reentry to the U.S.

Below is a general list of documentation and guidance for travelers.  We note that depending on the individual’s circumstances additional documentation may be recommended.

U.S. ENTRY: STATUS AND DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST

  • Confirm the validity of passports for all travelers. Valid passports are required for all international travelers and accompanying family members, including U.S. and Canadian citizens. Renew passports in advance to ensure at least six months’ validity at the time of any visa application or entry to the U.S. Many countries allow renewal of passports by mail through their consulates or embassies in the U.S.
  • Carry all documents required for admission to the U.S. Upon arrival in the U.S., some entrants may need to show additional evidence of work or status authorization in addition to a passport and valid visa stamp. Documents vary by visa classification but may include an original I-797, Approval Notice; endorsed Form I-129S; Advance Parole Document; Employment Authorization Document (EAD); Form DS-2019 with travel authorization; and/or travel endorsed Form I-20. Proof of COVID-19 vaccination is no longer required for international travelers entering the U.S.
  • Caution for B-1/B-2 or ESTA Travelers: Travelers seeking admission as business visitors in B-1 status or under the Visa Waiver Program (ESTA) should consult immigration counsel before travel if they have questions regarding the scope of permissible business activities. In general, engaging in productive work, including remote work, while physically present in the United States may be viewed as unauthorized employment.
  • Verify the U.S. admission classification/expiration date. Upon entry to the U.S., foreign nationals should expect a CBP officer to create an electronic I-94 record of their admissionAt many Ports of Entry, CBP has stopped issuing a passport stamp. If a stamp is issued, ensure that the classification is correct and immediately alert CBP to any errors.
  • Review your I-94 record. After each entry to the U.S., foreign nationals should access and review the electronic I-94 record available on the CBP website. This is more important than ever, as CBP no longer stamps passports at entry. Expiration dates for the I-94, underlying petition, or work permit may be different from the expiration date on the visa in the passport or on the passport stamp, if issued. Send Immigration Counsel a copy of your I-94 once you have retrieved it. Please remember, the Admit Until Date on the electronic I-94 is the only date that legally matters — not the visa or petition expiry date.

CHECKLIST FOR FOREIGN NATIONAL EMPLOYEES (AND EMPLOYERS) WHO DO NOT HAVE A VALID VISA IN THEIR CURRENT PASSPORT

  • Consult with Immigration Counsel in advance of travel. Immigration counsel can help to prepare for enhanced vetting and for the consular interview before you apply for a visa. Schedule consultations 60-90 days in advance whenever possible. Keep in mind that appointment wait times at U.S. consulates can range from a few days to a few months.
  • Check the Consulate’s website prior to travel. If you require visa issuance at a consulate abroad, review information on specific procedures regarding booking visa appointments and documentation required for visa interviews. Consular procedures vary widely and are subject to change with little notice.
  • Home or Country of Residence requirement. The U.S. Department of State (DOS) now requires visa applicants to schedule their visa interview appointments at the U.S. Embassy or Consulate in their country of nationality or residence.
  • Visa Appointments for all family members. DOS has limited the availability of interview waivers for most nonimmigrant visa categories. As a result, all nonimmigrant visa applicants, including applicants under the age of 14 and over the age of 79, are now generally required to attend in-person interview with a consular officer.
  • Complete Form DS-160.This form is required for all temporary visa applicants including dependent spouses and children of principal visa holders. Retain a copy of the final form at the time of submission. Many consulates require that the visa application be completed prior to scheduling a visa appointment. Be aware that consular posts are increasingly utilizing automated tools to cross-reference DS-160 data with past applications and public social media footprints. Ensure consistency across all historical filings.
  • Review your visa application/petition. Review the petition prepared by Immigration Counsel on your behalf prior to traveling, to ensure the accuracy of the information reported and consistency with applications.
  • Review your online profiles. This includes information in online employee profiles and company pages as well as social media profiles. Government officials at USCIS, U.S. consulates, and U.S. Ports of Entry review online profiles of visitors and foreign workers applying for benefits or seeking entry to the U.S. Note: Consular officers are now required to social media accounts on online presence for several nonimmigrant visa classifications.
  • Update company information. Employers should update company pages and sites such as Dunn & Bradstreet that may be referenced by immigration officers to verify employment or business information.
  • Gather employment verification. If you are applying for a temporary work visa, most consulates require current employment verification letters from employers. Request these letters in advance of travel to allow adequate time for Human Resources to prepare them. Maintain copies of recent paystubs as evidence of current employment. Ensure that that the employment verification letter is consistent with any immigration petition underlying the visa application, if applicable.
  • Disclose any arrests/detainment to Immigration Counsel. Consult with Immigration Counsel if you have been arrested or detained by law enforcement, even if not charged/convicted. Consult with counsel before departing the U.S. or applying for a visa or any other immigration benefit. Citations, arrests or detentions may require disclosure on applications and may impact immigration status and/or eligibility for immigration benefits.
  • Check consulate wait times. Review the consulate website for visa appointments and processing times and alert Immigration Counsel immediately if visa issuance is delayed due to security or background clearance issues.
  • Confirm consulate holiday hours. Consulates abroad observe both U.S. and local country holidays and some offices may be short-staffed due to vacations.
  • Tip for visa appointments: If the consulate has long wait times, book an appointment at the earliest date possible and check the website regularly for newly released appointment times that are more desirable.
  • Warning: Even successful interviews may result in ‘Administrative Processing’ (Section 221(g)), which can delay visa issuance by several weeks. Travelers should have a contingency plan for an extended stay abroad.

TRAVEL DOCUMENTS IF YOU DO NOT NEED A VISA FROM THE CONSULATE

  • Visa Waiver Program travelers must have a valid ESTA approval. The Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) is a mandatory, online pre-screening system for Visa Waiver Program (VWP) travelers. ESTA is only available for travelers who are citizens of recognized VWP countries who wish to enter the U.S. for B-1 business or B-2 tourism purposes. VWP travelers should apply for ESTA at least 72 hours prior to travel and must obtain a valid ESTA approval before traveling. The ESTA clearance will be valid for up to two years. Note that a new ESTA approval is needed when a VWP traveler obtains a new passport and/or changes their name or country of citizenship, and when answers to any of the VWP eligibility questions (e.g., regarding an arrest or visa denial) change.
  • Adjustment of Status applicants and Advance Parole travel documents. With the exception of some H and L visa holders, individuals with pending I-485, Adjustment of Status applications must have a valid original Advance Parole travel document issued prior to departing the U.S. Departing the U.S. without an Advance Parole may result in denial of the I-485 application. Note that the Advance Parole document must be valid when you depart the U.S. and valid when you return.
  • Automatic Visa Revalidation. Travelers planning short trips (under 30 days) to Canada or Mexico should consult counsel regarding Automatic Visa Revalidation, which may allow re-entry even if the visa stamp in the passport has expired.

HELPFUL LINKS

For specific travel-related questions, please contact your Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com


Amy McCoy

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Reasserts Discretionary Authority in Adjustment of Status Processing

On May 21, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, emphasizing the discretionary nature of Adjustment of Status (AOS) applications under Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). While early headlines and the memo’s rhetoric have caused significant concern by framing AOS as an “extraordinary form of relief,” the substantive immigration laws and eligibility regulations have not changed. On May 29, 2026, a USCIS spokesperson clarified that the announcement was intended as reminder to reviewing officers of their discretionary authority, not as a major policy shift.

This is not a nationwide freeze on AOS processing – applications, even those with disclosed minor violations or past arrests, continue to be reviewed and approved. Further, following on the May 29th announcement, most AOS applicants may see little to no change in case processing.

Background

AOS is the process through which an eligible foreign national who is physically present in the United States can obtain U.S. lawful permanent resident (LPR) status or a “green card”. There is also a route to LPR status known as “consular processing” through which eligible individuals apply for an immigrant visa through an overseas U.S. consular post. AOS is typically the last step in an employment-based permanent resident case through which the applicant submits a personal application to request the adjustment of his or her status to LPR. It is the most common pathway to LPR status for individuals who are already living in the U.S.

While a USCIS officer’s exercise of discretionary judgement has always been an element of AOS adjudication, the May 21 memorandum serves as a directive to adjudicating officers to look more closely at both positive and negative discretionary factors under a “totality of the circumstances” framework in determining whether the case is eligible for AOS processing. Of note, the absence of negative factors alone is not sufficient to warrant AOS processing.

Key Takeaways from the Guidance & Subsequent Statements

Reviewing officers are directed to evaluate the totality of an applicant’s history in determining whether AOS is appropriate.

Positive factors include:

  • strong family ties and caretaking duties in the U.S.
  • history of good moral character and community standing
  • consistent employment history and economic/tax contributions
  • long-term U.S. residence, property ownership, or business ties

Negative factors include:

  • past or current fraud, misrepresentation, or false testimony
  • status violations or unauthorized employment
  • conduct inconsistent with the purpose of temporary nonimmigrant status
  • failure to comply with admission or parole conditions

What This Means for Employers

  • Permitted Filings Continue: This directive does not prevent the filing or approval of AOS applications. For the vast majority of sponsored workers, moving forward with an AOS application remains the most practical path forward.
  • Impact on Dual Intent Classifications (H-1B, L-1): The memorandum explicitly acknowledges that filing for AOS is completely consistent with maintaining dual-intent statuses. However, it notes that holding a dual-intent visa does not automatically shield an applicant from a discretionary review.
  • Impact on Non-dual Intent Classifications (E, F-1, J-1, O-1, TN). Applicants in a non-dual intent visa category may face higher scrutiny regarding their original immigrant intent and subsequent conduct.

Planning Ahead for Employers

  • Maintain compliance documentation of authorized employment and lawful status.
  • Be prepared to provide discretionary evidence for applicants, including highlighting proof of any positive factors and preparing evidence to address any negative factors if questioned.
  • Work with your immigration attorney to determine whether to file an AOS or pursue consular processing would be in the best interests of the applicant.

Gibney will be closely monitoring the ongoing adjudications of AOS applications and any further USCIS announcements related to same. For questions regarding how this policy impacts your specific workforce or pending cases, please reach out to your Gibney attorney or email info@gibney.com.


Amy McCoy

USCIS Issues Interim Final Rule to Increase Scrutiny of Signature Requirements for Immigration Benefit Requests Starting July 10

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published an interim final rule which authorizes adjudicating officers to reject or deny benefit requests for invalid signatures.

Key Elements

  • Rejections/Denials: USCIS will reject or deny cases that have insufficient signatures.
  • Invalid Signatures: Invalid signatures include those which are typed, forged, copied from another document, stamped or pasted using Adobe.
  • Wet Signatures: Wet signatures are still accepted and photocopies or scanned copies of original forms with wet signatures are accepted; USCIS will retain the authority to later request evidence of the original wet signatures.
  • No Cure Permitted: Under the new rule, there is no ability to fix, or cure, an insufficient signature. Currently, for minor signature issues, USCIS officers issued a Request for Evidence (RFE) allowing the petitioner the ability to submit new wet-ink forms, and/or a statement confirming that the signature was authorized. Petitions with invalid signatures will now be rejected or denied, and will no longer be able to be cured.
  • Filing Fees: Fees will not be returned if USCIS denies an application or petition for deficient signatures.
  • Exceptions: Applications for a Certificate of Naturalization will be rejected rather than denied for insufficient signatures.

When Does the New Rule Take Effect?

The rule applies to benefit requests submitted on or after July 10, 2026.

What Employers Can Expect

  • USCIS drop boxes will reject all applications and petitions where there is an obvious deficiency, such as a missing or typed signature. Once a petition or application is receipted and accepted, USCIS officers will have the discretion to reject or deny cases with insufficient signatures.
  • The rule does not differentiate between a preparer’s signature and that of an applicant/petitioner. All signature fields will be subject to scrutiny during compliance reviews.

What Should Applicants and Petitioners Do?

  • All applications and petitions should be signed by the applicant/petitioner and their counsel (if applicable) in wet ink. While copies of signed forms may be submitted to USCIS, the originals must be maintained in the event that they are requested by USCIS.
  • Employers should confer with their counsel to ensure that their signing and filing practices comply with the rule prior to the July 10, 2026 implementation date.


Roderick Potts