Brian Brokate and Maja Szumarska Co-author Chapter on Anticounterfeiting Enforcement

Brian Brokate and and Maja Szumarska co-authored a chapter in PLI’s course handbook for the program Intellectual Property Law Institute 2018 on October 9, 2018. This program provides a complete analysis of key events in all areas of IP, including updates on cases, legislation and government agency developments that all IP lawyers need to know.

Their chapter is titled “Developing Trends in Enforcement and Remedies: What’s New in Civil, Criminal and Government Actions.”

For more information or to register for the event, visit the PLI website.

USCIS to Implement Notice to Appear Policy Memo

Starting October 1, 2018, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) will begin implementing its June 28, 2018 policy memorandum, Updated Guidance for the Referral of Cases and Issuance of Notices to Appear (NTAs) in Cases Involving Inadmissible and Deportable Aliens (NTA Policy Memo).

According to its announcement on September 26, 2018, USCIS will implement the NTA Policy Memo on an incremental basis. Pursuant to the policy, USCIS may issue a Notice to Appear (NTA) to a foreign national whose Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, or Form I-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, is denied, where the foreign national applicant does not have valid underlying immigration status. The policy will apply to I-485 and I-539 applications filed prior to the October 1, 2018 implementation date, as well as applications filed on or after that date. By way of background, an NTA is a charging document issued to a foreign national that initiates removal proceedings, requiring the individual to appear before an immigration judge to determine whether he/she should be removed from the United States.

USCIS stated that, at this time, it will not apply the NTA Policy Memo to employment-based petitions (e.g., Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker) and humanitarian applications, but it is expected to do so at a future date. USCIS did not provide a timeline for expanding the policy to other petitions and applications.

Gibney is working with clients to evaluate the impact of this new policy and how it is being implemented. We will provide updates as they become available.

If you have questions about this alert, please contact your designated Gibney or email info@gibney.com.

Cap-Subject H-1Bs Approved for Fiscal Year 2019 Take Effect October 1

H-1B cap-subject visa petitions filed and approved by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for Fiscal Year 2019 take effect October 1, 2018.

Change of Status Filings

Approved H-1B cap-subject petitions filed as “change of status” automatically take effect on October 1, 2018, if the beneficiary:

  • was physically present in the U.S. for the entire period from the date the petition was received through the date the application was approved; and,
  • is physically present in the U.S. on October 1, 2018 for the change of status to take effect.
  • With the exception of Canadian citizens, beneficiaries of approved H-1B cap petitions who depart the U.S. will need a valid H-1B visa to return to the U.S. in H-1B status. U.S. consulates require a personal interview to apply for a visa, and many consulates have a wait period of several weeks to schedule an interview. Actual visa processing times vary by consulate and can be found at the U.S. Department of State website. All intending visa applicants are advised to check the website of the consulate where they intend to apply for information on scheduling the interview and the visa application process.

Consular Notification Filings

Approved H-1B cap-subject petitions filed as “consular notification” will not automatically change the beneficiary’s status to H-1B without further action. To activate H-1B status for an approved consular notification petition, the beneficiary must depart the U.S. if not already abroad, obtain an H-1B visa at a U.S. consulate, and re-enter the U.S. utilizing the H-1B visa. H-1B status will take effect upon the date of re-entry into the U.S. Canadian citizens do not require a visa, but do need to activate a “consular notification” petition through a Port of Entry into the U.S.

Next Steps for Employers

  • Form I-9 Reverification: Employers may need to update the employment eligibility under Section 3 of Form I-9 for H-1B cap beneficiaries whose I-9 documents are expiring.
  • Taxes for F-1 and J-1 Non-Immigrants: F-1 students and J-1 exchange visitors who are maintaining valid status may be exempt from FICA tax withholding. However, once F-1 or J-1 foreign nationals change to H-1B status, they are no longer exempt and withholdings will need to be adjusted.
  • Pending H-1B Petitions: There are numerous H-1B cap petitions still pending and USCIS has stated that approval in October is not guaranteed. As such, employers need to be aware of foreign nationals who have work authorization ending prior to H-1B approval, and must specifically monitor the employment of F-1 “cap gap” students, as these individuals may need to come off payroll and/or take additional steps to maintain their valid immigration status as of October 1, 2018. See the recent USCIS statement here.

Premium Processing Fee Increase Takes Effect on October 1

Effective October 1, 2018, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is increasing the Form I-907 premium processing fee from $1,225 to $1,410. All applications postmarked on or after that date must include the new fee. As a reminder, premium processing is available for certain immigration petitions filed on Forms I-129 and I-140. With the payment of the premium processing fee and the filing of the I-907, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will process a petition within 15 calendar days or refund the amount. Note: Adjudication may result in an approval, a denial or a request for more evidence.

On August 28, 2018, USCIS announced that it would extend and expand the suspension of Premium Processing for certain H-1B petitions for a period estimated through at least February 19, 2019.

For more information, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

Court Allows DACA Protections to Continue while Lawsuit is Pending

A federal court judge in Texas has ruled in favor of keeping DACA in place for the time being, denying a request for a preliminary injunction that would have immediately halted DACA protections, but indicating the likelihood that DACA will be held illegal in final rulings.

DACA, or the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, was established by Executive Order in 2012 and grants protection from deportability and valid work authorization to approximately 800,000 undocumented immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children.  In September 2017, the Trump Administration announced that it would terminate DACA, spurring multiple lawsuits in federal courts across the country that resulted in rulings requiring DACA protections to continue.  On May 1, 2018, Texas and six other states responded with a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas challenging the legality of the DACA program itself and asking for a preliminary injunction that would halt DACA while the lawsuit is pending.

In denying the states’ request for a preliminary injunction, the court found that their delay in seeking relief indicated that DACA’s continuation did not cause immediate, irreparable harm to the states, and that implementing a preliminary injunction was against the public interest at this time.

The ruling provides temporary reprieve for the DACA program, however the court’s decision clearly indicates that DACA likely will be found unlawful by the court because the program was established without Congressional legislation, despite being “a popular program and one that Congress should consider saving.”

What Employers and Foreign Nationals Should Expect

Employers should be aware that employees with DACA status may lose work eligibility and/or the ability to remain in the U.S. Employers may also wish to consider working with legislative advocacy partners to support legislation. Foreign nationals with DACA status should consult with immigration counsel to discuss possible alternative immigration options and plan for program termination.

Gibney will continue to closely monitor these developments. For more information on this alert, please contact your designated Gibney representative, or email info@gibney.com.

Family Wealth Trust

FAMILY WEALTH TRUST

Chances are, you’ve already heard a lot about the attributes of Living Trusts and how important it is to avoid probate and legal quagmires, even lowering estate and/or income taxes and protecting privacy. Looking after these financial assets is only a part of planning for passing on your legacy. Typically, non-financial assets are more valued and often omitted when passing an estate to future generations. Focusing on complete “legacy planning” causes something more than a simple or bare bones Living Trust to be needed by most families. This special report details what a Family Wealth Trust can do for you and your family.

WHY CHOOSE A FAMILY WEALTH TRUST?

Providing for and protecting your heirs, along with passing on your values and your wisdom… are the most common reasons for creating a Family Wealth Trust. In the case of minors, a trust allows a parent to provide for a child without giving the child control over the property. The parent can also mandate how, or even when, the property is to be distributed and for what purposes.

A trust is also a useful tool for taking care of heirs who have mental impairments or lack investment experience. The trust document can establish that all money is controlled by a trustee with sound investment experience and judgment. Likewise, a trust preserves the integrity of funds when the recipient has a history of extravagance. It can protect the property from an heir’s spendthrift nature as well as from his or her creditors.

This is also true of persons who may feel pressure from friends, con artists, financial advisors and others who want a slice of the pie. A Family Wealth Trust can make it extremely difficult for a recipient to direct property to one of these uses.

A “spendthrift” provision in a Family Wealth Trust is often used to further preserve the integrity of assets. It prohibits the heir from transferring his or her interest and also bars creditors from reaching into the trust.  Family Wealth Trusts are relatively easy to update, modify or revoke in most cases. A will, however, is difficult to change, and establishing one requires many formalities.

SHORT-CIRCUITING THE ORDEAL OF PROBATE

One popular benefit of a Family Wealth Trust is the avoidance of probate. Because property in the trust is not considered part of an estate, it does not have to undergo this sometimes lengthy process. The property is instead administered and distributed by the trustee, according to the specific terms of the trust.

Probate expenses can be significant. Costs vary according to the size of the estate and what it includes. It also varies by state. Some have very expensive and onerous procedures, while others offer a streamlined version of probate.

Avoiding probate means not only avoiding hassle and expense, but also saving time. Probate can extend the amount of time before an heir receives an inheritance by months, years – even longer if the will is contested. Not only can this create hardship among the heirs, but the property in the estate may also suffer. Many assets must be carefully managed to preserve and enhance their value. Losses may easily occur during this interim period.

There is an emotional price to pay, too. Survivors may be continually reminded of the loss of a loved one as the process drags on.

Probate can also lead to loss of privacy. Wills and probate are public matters, whereas a Family Wealth Trust keeps the estate private. Typical probate documents list all assets, appraised value and names of new owners. This information becomes available to marketers, media, creditors and con artists.

If the estate includes real property in more than one state, the process becomes even more complex. An ancillary administration is required to probate out-of-state real estate. As you can imagine, “double probate” is even more time-consuming, expensive and emotionally taxing than a single probate process.

Probate also allows the original owner’s creditors a shot at the property. Although there is still some controversy about the extent of its creditor-shielding benefits, a Family Wealth Trust generally makes it much more difficult for an estate to be consumed by creditor claims.

MAINTAINING CONTROL

Family Wealth Trusts are harder to contest than wills. Part of the reason is that trusts usually involve ongoing contacts with bank officials, trustees and others who can later provide solid evidence of the owner’s intentions and mental state. A Family Wealth Trust that has been in place a long period of time is less likely to be challenged as having been subjected to undue influence or fraud. And because it is a very private document, the terms of the trust might not even be revealed to family members, allowing less opportunity for challenges to its provisions.

A Family Wealth Trust also avoids the painful ordeal of “living probate.” That’s what happens when a person is no longer competent to manage property, whether because of illness or other causes. Without a Family Wealth Trust, a judge must examine whether you are in fact incompetent, and all of the embarrassing details of your incompetence will be dragged out in court. The judge will appoint a guardian – perhaps someone you would not want to manage your affairs. Guardians act under court supervision and often must submit detailed reports, meaning that the process can become quite expensive.

With a Family Wealth Trust, your designated trustee takes over management of trust property and must manage it according to your explicit instructions in the trust document. The terms typically set standards for determining whether you are incompetent or not. For example, you may specify that your doctor must declare you can no longer manage your financial and business affairs.

MANAGING ASSETS, EASING TAX BURDENS

Family Wealth Trusts also provide a way for beneficiaries to receive the guidance of professional asset managers. A bank may be named as a Successor Trustee or Co-Trustee, allowing an experienced trust department to manage the assets.

Of course, eliminating or reducing taxes is one of the primary goals of estate planning. Trusts allow for a highly flexible approach to taxes. Income taxes can be slashed by transferring income-producing assets to a recipient in a lower tax bracket. Through the use of trusts, the state and federal government’s estate tax exclusions can be doubled, without the filing of an estate tax return unless the decedent had more than the respective state or federal applicable exclusion. And some trusts are a prudent destination for annual gifts that fall within the government’s tax-free gift allowance.

ARE THERE DISADVANTAGES TO A FAMILY WEALTH TRUST?

A trust may not be needed by all individuals and families. Depending on the terms, trusts can result in some loss of control.

Also, it is important to transfer all titled property into the trust on a regular basis to keep it current. Property outside the trust is part of the individual’s estate, and will trigger the probate process you hoped to avoid by creating the Family Wealth Trust. Formal transfers of property into the trust are required even when you and the trustee are the same individual.

A Family Wealth Trust costs more than a will to create, although it saves large amounts later through its probate-avoidance feature. Deeds will be necessary for transferring real property into the trust, and that will also involve some additional expense. Also, attention must be paid to keeping the trust current. That means making sure all property is in the trust, and adjusting it for changed circumstances; for example, after the birth of a child or the dissolution of a marriage.

If these seem like minor disadvantages, you’re right. For most people, the attention and initial expense involved in a Family Wealth Trust is worth the significant benefits for family and other heirs: the avoidance of probate, the tax advantages, and the preservation of privacy and independence.

© American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.

USCIS Increases Premium Processing Suspension for H-1B Petitions

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that it will extend and expand the suspension of Premium Processing for certain H-1B petitions for a period estimated through at least February 19, 2019.

Background on Premium Processing

H-1B petitions filed under the regular processing method have been increasingly subject to lengthy adjudication times from six to eight months or longer. Premium Processing is an expedited method of adjudication available for certain non-immigrant and immigrant visa petitions, including H-1B petitions. Premium Processing is requested by filing Form I-907 and including an additional government filing fee of $1,225.00. It guarantees a response by USCIS (either an adjudication or Request for Further Evidence) within fifteen (15) calendar days of a petition being submitted.

Impact on H-1B Petitions

H-1B petitions that are subject to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 cap, request new employment, request an amendment to existing employment, or request a change of employer, and that are filed and receipted into the USCIS on or after September 11, 2018 will no longer be eligible for Premium Processing until further notice, and will be subject to significantly lengthier processing times than may otherwise be secured through the Premium Processing method.The biggest impact is likely to be lengthy delays for new hires who are transferring H-1B status and change of employer petitions. As the USCIS also recently issued a new policy effective September 11, 2018, allowing USCIS officers with the discretion to deny petitions outright without first providing an opportunity to respond to a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), it further increases the risks for H-1B transfers, and the ability for foreign nationals to utilize portability. Petitioners who are filing an extension of status with no material change to the job role, and certain cap-exempt employers, will be exempt from this suspension policy.

Other Considerations

It is unclear whether the USCIS will continue to honor expedited processing for H-1B petitions submitted with Premium Processing that have been filed and receipted but not yet adjudicated prior to September 11, 2018. USCIS has stated it may choose to adjudicate these petitions under regular processing and return any related filing fees for the Form I-907 requesting Premium Processing.USCIS estimates that this suspension will remain in effect until February 19, 2019. However, it is unclear at this time if the suspension will be further expanded or extended.

If H-1B cap-subject petitions selected in the lottery are not adjudicated by October 1, there may be an impact on certain F-1 students who are currently working under “cap-gap” provisions.

Expedite Options

The USCIS has noted that discretionary expedite requests for processing remain available for certain petitions. However, these requests are only accepted in very limited situations, including a showing of severe financial loss to a company or person, emergency situations, or humanitarian reasons, among others. All expedite requests are reviewed on a case-by-case basis and granted at the sole discretion of the USCIS’s office leadership.Gibney is working with clients to evaluate the impact of this new policy and how it is being implemented.

If you have any questions about this alert, please contact your Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

New York State and New York City Sexual Harassment Laws to Take Effect

In April we reviewed the newly enacted New York State and New York City sexual harassment laws that were coming into effect later in the year. As New York State and New York City publish guidance on these new laws, it is a good time for employers to review their policies to ensure they are compliant with their new obligations.

Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act Taking Effect on September 6

Background

On May 9, 2018, Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act. This new law expands sexual harassment protections under the New York City Human Rights Law by applying provisions related to gender-based discrimination to all employers, regardless of the number of employees. It also increases the statute of limitations for filing harassment claims from one year to three years from the time that the alleged harassment occurred.

New Notice and Training Requirements for Employers

  • Effective September 6, 2018, all employers are required to display anti-sexual harassment rights and responsibilities notices in both English and Spanish. All employers are also required to distribute a fact sheet to individual employees at the time of hire. A copy of the fact sheet is available here.
  • Effective April 1, 2019, employers with 15 or more employees are required to conduct annual anti-sexual harassment training for all employees.

New York State Sexual Harassment Prevention Law Taking Effect on October 9

Background

On April 12, 2018, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a new sexual harassment prevention law. The new law limits confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements, precludes the arbitration of sexual harassment claims, expands coverage of sexual harassment laws to contractors, vendors, and consultants, and requires employers to adopt sexual harassment prevention policies and conduct annual training on such policies.

Templates for New Policy and Training Materials Released by New York State

  • Effective October 9, 2018, New York State employers are required to adopt a sexual harassment prevention policy that equals or exceeds the minimum standards set out in a model policy to be promulgated by the State. Employers also are required to conduct annual sexual harassment prevention training for all employees based on that policy. On Thursday, August 23, the State published drafts of minimum standards, a model policy, a model complaint form, and model training materials. Copies of these draft standards and templates are available here. Although these drafts will not become final until the comment period closes on September 12, 2018, given that the law will become effective on October 9, employers would be well served to review these drafts now to determine whether they need to update their existing policies and training materials. We will continue to follow up with the State and will issue another alert once the State authored standards and templates are made final, highlighting any changes to the drafts released last week.

For questions about how to comply with the new sexual harassment prevention laws, contact labor and employment partner Robert J. Tracy at rjtracy@gibney.com or (212) 705-9814.

USCIS Provides Updated Guidance for STEM OPT

On August 17, 2018, USCIS updated its website to clarify obligations and reporting responsibilities for employees and employers participating in the F-1 STEM OPT program, including obligations related to training at third-party sites, staffing and temporary agencies. USCIS clarified that training may take place at third party sites, if certain conditions are met and there is a bona fide employer-employee relationship. USCIS refers to the employer-employee relationship as defined in the regulations and regulatory comments published in 2016, when current STEM OPT rules became effective. The guidance confirms that the employer signing the training plan must also provide the training experience, and that the “’personnel’ who may provide and supervise the training experience may be either employees of the employer, or contractors who the employer has directly retained to provide services to the employer; they may not, however, be employees or contractors of the employer’s clients or customers.

It is important that employees and employers understand their obligations given increased penalties for non-compliance with F-1 OPT regulations effective August 9, 2018.

For specific legal advice, please contact immigration counsel or email info@gibney.com.

Asset Protection

In the face of litigation, there are proven strategies that will ethically preserve your wealth. Your most powerful weapons will be a variety of estate planning tools, including the Family Limited Partnership, the Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, the Children’s Trust, and Foreign Asset Protection Trusts.

THE CHILDREN’S TRUST

One way to place asset beyond the reach of potential plaintiffs is to transfer property to your children. Like most parents, you’ve probably been acquiring an estate not only for your benefit while you are alive but also to help your children and grandchildren. The IRS will allow you to give up to $15,000 per person per year absolutely free of gift tax. If both spouses join in the gift, you can give up to $30,000 per person a year, gift tax-free. (As indexed for inflation.)

By giving property to a Children’s Trust each year, you can shift the income from your high tax bracket to the lower tax bracket of your children or grandchildren who are age 14 and older. Unfortunately, children under age 14 must pay most of their taxes at the same rate as their parents.

Once the Children’s Trust is sufficiently funded, it can pay the cost of a child’s education. That way the expenses are paid with discounted tax dollars. (However, remember that parents or grandparents can pay tuition costs directly as a tax-free gift.)

If you own a business, you can gift its equipment and furniture to the Children’s Trust and have the trust lease it back to the business. Under this plan, the business gets a legitimate tax deduction, and the rental income is earned by the trust potentially at lower tax rates. Plus, the benefit of the depreciation is given to the trust.

Having a Children’s Trust or a Family Limited Partnership also promotes family investment values. The children now have an identifiable stake in the family’s financial success. It goes a long way toward helping them understand the value of money and wise investments.

How does the Children’s Trust protect assets? Well, all assets transferred to the trust are no longer in your name or owned by you, and are, therefore, outside the reach of plaintiffs or creditors, whether yours or your children’s. However, you can’t transfer assets when you have pending claims or lawsuits against you. Transfers at that time will violate something called the fraudulent transfer law. This will allow the courts to ignore the gifts to the trust and permit your creditors to seize them.

The Children’s Trust also has probate avoidance and estate tax reduction benefits. All assets transferred to the trust are no longer a part of your estate. That means when you die, those assets will not go through probate and they will not be subject to federal estate tax.

If you had three children and gave each of them $30,000 in trust per year for 10 years, that would amount to $900,000 of tax-free gifts to their trust. At death, none of that $900,000 would be subject to federal estate tax.

Before creating a Children’s Trust as part of an asset protection program, ask yourself whether you can permanently do without the benefits of the property. Once title is transferred into the trust, there is no going back. This trust can’t be revoked or amended, so only transfer the assets that won’t be needed by you to meet your personal expenses.

THE IRREVOCABLE LIFE INSURANCE TRUST

You probably already know several reasons why life insurance is important. Young families need it to replace part of a breadwinner’s income. Mature Americans find it provides their heirs with a source of funds to pay estate taxes.

Life insurance can do all this and shield assets from litigation at the same time. How? By use of the Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT). An ILIT is a good idea even if you don’t worry about suits or creditors, because it allows the full value of your life insurance to pass tax-free to heirs. Without an ILIT, the government will count the face value of an insurance policy in calculating your taxable estate. Anything over the estate tax exclusion is subject to “death tax” at a 40% rate.

When you set up your ILIT, you name a trustee other than yourself, most likely a beneficiary. The trustee purchases a life insurance contract on your life with funds you provide. If you have an existing policy, you can assign ownership of it to the ILIT, but there are conditions imposed on these transactions that should be carefully considered before you do so. For instance, if you die within three years of the transfer, the life insurance contract will be included in your estate.

As we saw in the case of the Children’s Trust, a taxpayer may give up to $15,000 (indexed for inflation) annually to another person free of gift taxes. Other than the per-person rule, there’s no limit on the total amount you can give away. For example, if you have five children and eight grandchildren, you and your spouse could give each one $30,000, for a total of $390,000 annually, gift tax-free. That can buy a lot of life insurance. By carefully following the IRS rules, you can employ this gift tax exemption to make the policy’s premium payments.

Reducing your estate tax liability is a powerful incentive for considering the ILIT. But that’s just the beginning of the long list of benefits it provides.

The ILIT gives you control over how proceeds from your life insurance policy are spent. You control who receives the proceeds and how they receive them. Whatever distribution strategy makes most sense for you and your loved ones, the ILIT gives you the opportunity to put it in effect.

And, of course, there’s its important asset protection benefit. Over the years, your premiums and interest earnings can accumulate to considerable sums, making cash value policies a tantalizing target for creditors. When the policy is owned by the ILIT, however, it is out of the reach of creditors.

FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

A Family Limited Partnership (FLP) is one of the most popular estate tax and asset protection planning devices. An FLP is simply a limited partnership similar to the real estate or business operating limited partnerships with which many are familiar. When you transfer your business and investment assets into an FLP, you receive in return:

General Partnership Interest: Generally, you receive just 2% of the total partnership interests in the form of general partnership interests. That means that you control all of the decision-making for the FLP’s activities.

Limited Partnership Interest: You receive the remaining 98% of the FLP in the form of limited partnership interests. Limited partnership interests give the limited partner very limited rights in partnership income and activities. While general partners may not treat a limited partner unfairly, a limited partner essentially has no meaningful control or rights.

You are now the proud owner of your very own FLP. You are the 2% general partners and control the partnership. Now what happens? You will give your children some of your limited partnership interests. That means that the partnership has partners other than just you.

As a general partner, you have complete control and access to the assets and income of the FLP in accordance with terms you designed. If you have given your children 10% of the FLP, they are entitled to 10% of any distributions that you decide to make, but they cannot force you to make any distributions.

Note: If estate tax reduction is one of the other purposes of the FLP, additional restrictions may be required.

HOW DOES THE ASSET PROTECTION BENEFIT WORK?

If you are successfully sued, all the plaintiff is able to receive is a “charging order.” That’s a judgment against the partner that tells the partnership that any distributions of profit that would otherwise be made to the debtor partner must instead be paid to the plaintiff/creditor. But the plaintiff has no power to interfere in partnership matters.

The charging order is a very hollow victory. Because the general partners decide if profit is to be distributed to the partners, the general partners can withhold distributions for partnership purposes and the creditor receives nothing.

Obviously, the creditor does not just go away, but because the charging order provides so little leverage, creditors frequently settle the claim for less than face value. Those who might consider filing an unjustified lawsuit may change their minds when they realize that all they will receive is a hollow charging order.

FOREIGN ASSET PROTECTION TRUST

The ultimate asset protection tool is a Foreign Asset Protection Trust.

What is a Foreign Trust? In many ways a Foreign Trust looks exactly like a Domestic Trust. The trustor is you, the person who transfers the assets to the trust. The trustee is a trust company, experienced in asset management, whose business is operated outside of the United States in a jurisdiction that does not recognize United States judgments.

In a typical trust, the trustee is given discretion to accumulate or distribute trust income among a specified class of beneficiaries. You may be one of the named beneficiaries, together with your spouse, children, or grandchildren.

One unique feature of this kind of trust is the role of the “Protector.” The trust protector is a person who has the power to take virtually any actions necessary to protect your trust. The term of the trust may be limited to a period of years. You can often specify that the trust will last for a term of 10 years with several optional renewal periods.

One way to use a Foreign Trust is to set it up and then transfer your cash, securities and other liquid portable assets to an account established under the name of the trust at a bank of your choice in a foreign jurisdiction.

We’ve found that many people are reluctant to transfer their assets out of the country or give up the day-to-day control of their investments unless it’s absolutely necessary. To solve these concerns, planners combine the best elements of the Foreign Trust with the management and control of the limited partnership. Under this arrangement, you and your spouse are the general partners with total management and control over the partnership assets. But instead of you and your spouse holding a limited partnership share, you transfer that interest to a trust in a favorable foreign jurisdiction.

As the holder of the limited partnership interest, the foreign trustee has no right to interfere with management of the partnership. You alone manage your finances. Even though the trustee holds the limited partnership certificate, the assets themselves are physically located in the United States. This set-up provides maximum flexibility and sound lawsuit protection.

One of the most appealing features of a Foreign Asset Protection Trust is that it produces absolutely no income tax benefits. Under current tax law, the trust is simply ignored for tax purposes. Like the Living Trust, all of the income is reported and tax is paid on your personal income tax return. The reason this is attractive is that it allows you to create your foreign trust without interference or objection by the IRS. Because it doesn’t affect your income tax liability, the government really pays little attention to these trusts.

We’ve seen that the Foreign Asset Protection Trust is easy to set up and there are little or no tax consequences. We’ve also seen that when the Foreign Asset Protection Trust is combined with a domestic limited partnership, you retain complete management and control over your finances.

So what role does the Foreign Trust play and why is it touted to be the ultimate in creditor protection? The simple answer is that U.S. courts and judges have no jurisdiction over the foreign trustee and the limited partnership interest.

Let’s say a judgment has been handed down against you. Your first move would be to liquidate the limited partnership and make a distribution of each partner’s share. The Foreign Trustee would receive the vast majority of partnership assets, and these would now be held offshore.

Obviously, if your creditor wants to get his hands on the property, he will have to travel to the foreign jurisdiction and ask the local court to enforce his U.S. judgment. Whether he wins or loses in the foreign court depends on the laws of the jurisdiction you chose as the home of your trust.

Selecting a Jurisdiction

That’s why selecting the proper jurisdiction for your Foreign Trust is a matter of critical importance. You should consider the following factors:

  • Communicating with the trustee must be very convenient.
  • Look for a well-developed telephone system and for a country that conducts its business affairs in English.
  • Look for an area with a long tradition of trust law and for experienced trustees who understand their role in asset protection planning.
  • Find a country that does not tax income earned by your trust.
  • Your jurisdiction should impose harsh penalties on anyone who discloses confidential trust and banking information.
  • The country should make it very difficult for a creditor to file suit against your trust and should not recognize or enforce U.S. judgments.
  • There should be no restrictions on your right to move currency or assets in or out of the country and, finally, the jurisdiction should have a stable government built on sound English and American legal principles.

Here’s a list of some of the more popular jurisdictions for your asset protection trust that have all of the important features we mentioned. The first four, the Bahamas, Bermuda, Barbados and the Cayman Islands, are located right offshore and are easily reachable by air. They have long been known for their international banking and asset protection activities. For example, the Cayman Islands is home to more than 530 operating banks and trust companies and has in excess of $425 billion in total assets under management.

The Cook Islands are a group of islands in the South Pacific. Between 1901 and 1965, they were part of New Zealand. In 1965, they became independent and self-governing under their own constitution. The Cook Islands have no income tax and have been developing in recent years into the jurisdiction of choice for asset protection planning.

© American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.