Biden Administration Plans to Lift Regional COVID-19 Travel Bans and Replace with Global Vaccination Requirement for International Travelers

The American Immigration Lawyers Association and various news outlets are reporting that, effective early November 2021, the Biden administration intends to:

  • Rescind the regional COVID-19 travel bans restricting travel to the U.S. from China, Iran, the Schengen Area, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Brazil, South Africa, and India.
  • Replace the regional travel bans with a global requirement that all foreign national travelers provide proof of full vaccination against COVID-19 and proof of a negative COVID-19 test taken within 3 days prior to boarding a flight to the U.S. Limited exceptions may be made for children ineligible for a vaccine and for humanitarian considerations if an individual lacks access to a vaccination but has a critical reason to travel.

Additional Information

The official policy has not been released as of the publication of the this alert. However, the administration has shared the following information with the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA):

  • Starting in early November, foreign nationals traveling to the U.S. will be required to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and to show proof of vaccination prior to boarding an airplane.
  • The current requirement for everyone to show proof of a negative test taken within 3 days of boarding a flight to the U.S. will remain in place for all fully vaccinated travelers.
  • American citizens and permanent residents who are not vaccinated will be required to have a COVID-19 test taken within 1 day of  a flight to the U.S. rather than 3 days.
  • The new requirements will apply globally as the U.S. moves toward a consistent, stringent requirement for all international air travelers coming to the U.S.
  • The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) will publish guidance concerning testing requirements and  which vaccines will be accepted. The CDC will also issue a Contact Tracing Order that will require airlines to collect comprehensive contact information for every passenger coming to the United States and to provide that information promptly to CDC upon request, to follow up with travelers who have been exposed to COVID-19 variants or other pathogens.
  • The policy will apply globally to all international air travel to the U.S.  Restrictions on non-essential travel at the land borders to the U.S. will remain in place at least through October 21, 2021. The administration is not updating its land border policies at this time.
  • Exceptions to the international air travel requirements will be very narrow and may include children not eligible for a vaccine and individuals lacking access to a vaccine in a timely manner. Such individuals must agree to be vaccinated upon arrival in the U.S.
  • Requirements for National Interest Exemptions for travelers from the current travel restricted regions will remain in place until the regional travel bans are rescinded and the new travel requirements are implemented in early  November.

Although not effective until early November, the administration has announced its intended policy now to give the various impacted government agencies such as the Department of Homeland  Security, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the CDC time to develop the directives and processes to implement the required changes and to provide airlines and businesses an opportunity to plan ahead for international travel contemplating the new requirements.

Gibney is monitoring this matter closely and will provide updates and more detailed information and guidance when the implementing policy guidelines are released.   In the interim, for additional information concerning travel restrictions to the U.S., please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

Court Vacates Rule Favoring High-Wage Earners in H-1B Cap Selection Process

A federal district court has struck down a legacy Trump administration rule that would have replaced the annual H-1B cap lottery with a scheme to favor high-wage earners.

If implemented, the rule would have adversely impacted employers wishing to sponsor  H-1B petitions for entry level professionals positions with corresponding entry level wages, including petitions for recent foreign student graduates from U.S. universities.   The rule would have also harmed non-profit institutions, including many hospitals, and small businesses unable to compete with larger enterprises offering higher wages.  Inevitably foreign students graduates, including scientists, heath care professionals, IT professionals and others, would be required to depart the U.S. after graduation  with this key immigration option eliminated.

Notably, the Biden administration did not abandon the rule when it took office, but only delayed its implementation to December 31, 2021.  The U.S. Chamber of Commerce led a group of plaintiffs that included universities other organizations challenging the legality of the rule, and this week, the court agreed with plaintiffs that Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Chad Wolf was not lawfully appointed at the time the rule was promulgated, and thus had no authority to issue the rule.  The court did not address whether the Immigration and Nationality Act allows DHS to prioritize the selection of H-1B visas based on wages or another factor, one of the arguments alleged by the plaintiffs.

Looking Ahead

The rule is not inconsistent with the  Biden administration’s stated aim to incentive higher wages for nonimmigrant and high-skilled workers. The administration does have the option of promulgating another rule – this time with a lawfully appointed Secretary of Homeland Security – but even so, such a rule is unlikely to be implemented before the  fiscal year 2023 H-1B cap registration period which commences in March 2022.  A similar rule favoring high wage earners would also face the same substantive legal challenges, particularly that such a proposal is inconsistent with, and flatly contradicted by, the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The case is U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 20-cv-07331 (N.D. Ca., March 19, 2021).

 

New COVID-19 Vaccination Requirement for Green Card Applicants

Effective October 1, 2021, by order of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC),  USCIS and the U.S. Department of State will require individuals applying for permanent resident status to be vaccinated for COVID-19, with limited exceptions.  Refugees are also covered by the order.  Proof of full COVID-19 vaccination will be required along with the other vaccination requirements already in place in connection with green card applications.

Who is Impacted?

If the medical exam is completed before October 1, 2021, and the exam results are within the validity period (typically 2 years from completion with some exceptions), COVID-19 vaccination is not required.

Exemptions

Blanket waivers of the vaccination requirement are available if

  • The vaccination is not age appropriate.  This includes applicants younger than the lowest age limit for the approved COVID-19 vaccine formulations in use.
  • The vaccination is medically contraindicated.
  • The applicant does not have access to one of the approved COVID-19 vaccines in their country.

In all instances, the request for exemption must be documented.

Applicants may also apply for an individual waiver of the vaccine requirement on religious or moral grounds. USCIS will make the determination as to whether an individual waiver will be granted. If the wavier is denied and the individual is not vaccinated, the individual will be deemed inadmissible, and ineligible for lawful permanent resident status.

Proof of Vaccination and Associated Requirements

Approved COVID-19 vaccines  are those authorized for emergency use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration  or those  listed for emergency use by the World Health Organization.

Written documentation proving vaccination is required. This may include:

  • An official vaccination record.
  • A medical chart with physician entries pertaining to the vaccination.
  • Appropriate medical personnel attestation.

An individual’s personal attestation that they have been vaccinated is not sufficient.  Additionally, an individual may not be exempted from the vaccination requirement on the basis of testing that establishes immunity  or recovery from prior COVID-19 infection.

Finally, keep in mind that proof of vaccination does not exempt international travelers from the requirement to present proof of a negative COVID-19 test prior to boarding an international flight to the U.S.

For additional information about this emerging requirement, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

Protecting Your Brand: Five Cost-Effective Customs & Border Protection Tools to Stop Counterfeit Goods at the Border

With the ever-evolving world of brand protection, it may be easy to overlook some of the strongest tools available for protecting a brand. We are often drawn to the latest software or technology to stop counterfeits from making their way into the US. However, these may be part of a broader strategy that includes the tools Customs & Border Protection (CBP) makes available. If you are protecting a brand and have a tight budget, please take a look at some lower cost opportunities.

  1. Recordation
    Fundamental to any effort is the registration of your trademarks with PTO. Once you are registered, your brand protection journey has only just begun. Take a look on iprs.cbp.gov to determine if you have any recorded trademarks (or copyrights). If you do not, begin the CBP e-recordation process immediately. For a small fee ($190 per mark, per class), you can record you mark with CBP. This affords additional protection at the border and violative goods stand a better chance of detention and eventual seizure.
  2. Product Guides
    Recordation alone is not enough. Be prepared to develop training materials that CBP Officers and Import Specialists may use to become aware of your product and learn some quick ID tips that can be applied in the field. Training materials need to contain the trademarks and recordations along with contact information and key details on your products. The guides may be provided to CBP for online distribution or directly to personnel during live training events.
  3. Training
    To get your brand to remain visible and in the minds of CBP personnel throughout US ports, it is important to conduct training whether virtual or live. While the current pandemic has paused much of the in-person training, there are virtual sessions available directly with CBP or through organizations like the IACC (International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition). Training is a way to keep CBP updated and aware of brand developments. In the right circumstances, it also provides a chance to make one-on-one connections and to learn and understand what is happening day to day at the port level.
  4. Seizures
    Now that you have created a guide and trained, what happens next? You may begin to receive inquiries from the ports requesting assistance in determining if particular imported goods are indeed counterfeit during the detention stage. CBP may provide you with images and some basic information when they reach out to you during the detention stage. Please answer these inquiries as quickly as possible; within 24 hours. In order to perfect the seizure, they often rely on brand representatives to point out three key inconsistencies in the images provided. Your answers will assist them in their determination. It is CBP that makes the ultimate decision as to the violative nature of the goods at issue.
  5. Notice Letters
    If all goes well and your assistance has allowed CBP to determine it will seize the goods, a few days to several months later, you will receive a seizure notice electronically or in the mail which lays out significantly more information than you were provided at the detention stage. What you do with the details in the letter is a function of personnel and budget. Having importer and recipient information along with quantity may allow you to locate large sources or recipients of goods for possible criminal or civil action. You may wish to go a step further and send cease and desist letters to all importers to put them on notice. In all cases you should maintain the key information in a data base.

Working to thwart the importation and sale of counterfeit goods is never an easy task.  These steps provide ways to work with CBP to support their efforts and improve your success at brand protection. Take advantage of recordation and training as affordable and proven ways to take your enforcement budget further.

For questions about this process, email Angelo E.P. Mazza at aepmazza@gibney.com.

USCIS Selects Additional  FY 2022 H-1B Cap Registrations: What Employers and Foreign Nationals Need to Know

USCIS conducted a second lottery for the fiscal year (FY) 2022 H-1B cap on July 28, 2021 and has notified employers that additional registrations have been selected.  Employers with selected registrations from the second lottery may file an H-1B petition for the beneficiary of a selected registration during the 90-day period running from  August 2, 2021 to November 3,  2021.

USCIS conducted its initial  H-1B cap lottery  in March 2021, and selected employers had a 90-day window during which to file H-1B cap petitions for selected beneficiaries.  The second lottery was conducted because the number of H-1B petitions ultimately submitted and  approved during the initial H-1B filing period (April 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021) were not sufficient to meet the annual statutory H-1B cap.   H-1B cap registrations that were not selected in the initial lottery remained in a reserve and the July lottery was conducted from this reserve. USCIS has not announced how many additional registrations were selected from the reserve.

What This Means for Employers and Foreign Nationals:

  • Employers with selected registrations will see updates in their myUSCIS accounts, including a selection notice and details of when and where to file the H-1B cap petition.
  • Only employers with selected registrations may file H-1B cap-subject petitions for FY 2022 and only for the beneficiary named in the applicable selected registration notice; no substitution of beneficiaries is permitted.
  • An H-1B cap-subject petition for a selected registration must be properly filed at the designated  service center and within the filing period(August 2, 2021 to November 3, 2021)  specified on the relevant registration selection notice.
  • Online filing is not available for H-1B petitions. Petitioners must file by paper and must include a printed copy of the applicable registration selection notice with the FY 2022 H-1B cap-subject petition.
  • Registration selection only indicates that employers are eligible to file H-1B cap-subject petitions; it does not signify that the petition will be approved.
  • Petitioners filing H-1B cap-subject petitions, including those eligible for the advanced degree exemption, must submit evidence and establish eligibility for approval based on existing statutory and regulatory requirements.

For more information, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

Understanding Intracompany Transferee Visas and the Associated Green Card Sponsorship Process

Quick Take from Hasta La Visa, Baby Podcast Episode 1: Down The Hall and to the Left: Intracompany Transferees and Home Alone 2

In Episode 1 we discuss the characteristics and differences of L-1A and L-1B Intracompany Transferee visas and the Employment Based First Preference multinational manager green card sponsorship process.

In this quick take article, we break down what employers need to know about these options for transferring and retaining employees from affiliated companies into the U.S.

L-1A Nonimmigrant Visa for Executive or Manager

The L-1A visa status provides a pathway for a multinational corporation to transfer an executive or manager from one of its foreign offices to one of its affiliated U.S. offices. Foreign companies that do not yet have an affiliated U.S. office can also transfer an executive or manager to the U.S. to establish a new office.

L-1B Nonimmigrant Visa for Employees with Specialized Knowledge

The L-1B visa status allows a multinational corporation to transfer a professional employee with “specialized knowledge” from one of its foreign offices to one of its affiliated U.S. offices. Specialized knowledge refers to either special knowledge possessed by an individual of the company’s product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management, or other interests and its application to international markets, or an advanced level of knowledge or expertise in the organization’s processes and procedures.

How can employers apply for an L-1A or L-1B nonimmigrant visa on behalf of an employee?

Employers can file a Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker on behalf of their employee with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. They must have a qualifying relationship with a foreign company, and either be actively doing business or planning to do business as an employer in the U.S. and at least one other country for the duration of the employee’s stay in the U.S.

How do employees qualify for an L-1A or L-1B nonimmigrant visa?

  • Employees must have been working for a qualifying organization abroad for at least one continuous year within the three years immediately before admission to the U.S.
  • For the L-1A Intracompany Transferee Executive or Manager visa classification, the employee must be entering the U.S. to provide professional services in an executive or managerial capacity for a branch of the same employer or one of its qualifying organizations in the U.S.
  • For the L-1B Intracompany Specialized Knowledge visa classification, they must have special knowledge of the company product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management, or other interests or expertise in their processes and procedures.

Employment-Based First Preference Multinational Executive or Manager Green Card Sponsorship Process

This is a fast track Green Card sponsorship process, typically applicable to those who are already in L-1A visa status. The sponsored employee must have worked for an affiliate of the sponsoring employer abroad in an executive or managerial capacity and then be working in the U.S. for the affiliate in a similar executive or managerial capacity. Employers must complete and file a Form I-140 Immigration petition on behalf of the sponsored employee with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

About Hasta La Visa, Baby: This podcast presents real world U.S. immigration law concepts by doing a deep-dive into the relationship between U.S. immigration law and fictitious characters in popular television and film.

Understanding Intracompany Transferee Visas and the Associated Green Card Sponsorship Process  

In Episode 1 of the Hasta La Visa, Baby Podcast, we discuss the characteristics and differences of L-1A and L-1B Intracompany Transferee visas. We also highlight the Employment Based First Preference multinational manager green card sponsorship process. In this quick take article, we break down what employers need to know about these options for transferring and retaining employees from affiliated companies into the U.S.

L-1A Nonimmigrant Visa for Executive or Manager

The L-1A visa status provides a pathway for a multinational corporation to transfer an executive or manager from one of its foreign offices to one of its affiliated U.S. offices. Foreign companies that do not yet have an affiliated U.S. office can also transfer an executive or manager to the U.S. to establish a new office.

L-1B Nonimmigrant Visa for Employees with Specialized Knowledge

The L-1B visa status allows a multinational corporation to transfer a professional employee with “specialized knowledge” from one of its foreign offices to one of its affiliated U.S. offices. Specialized knowledge refers to either special knowledge possessed by an individual of the company’s product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management, or other interests and its application to international markets, or an advanced level of knowledge or expertise in the organization’s processes and procedures.

How can employers can apply for an L-1A or L-1B nonimmigrant visa on behalf of an employee?

Employers can file a Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker on behalf of their employee with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. They must have a qualifying relationship with a foreign company, and either be actively doing business or planning to do business as an employer in the U.S. and at least one other country for the duration of the employee’s stay in the U.S.

How do employees qualify for an L-1A or L-1B nonimmigrant visa?

  • Employees must have been working for a qualifying organization abroad for at least one continuous year within the three years immediately before admission to the U.S.
  • For the L-1A Intracompany Transferee Executive or Manager visa classification, the employee must be entering the U.S. to provide professional services in an executive or managerial capacity for a branch of the same employer or one of its qualifying organizations in the U.S. .
  • For the L-1B Intracompany Specialized Knowledge visa classification, they must have special knowledge of the company product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management, or other interests or expertise in their processes and procedures.

Employment Based First Preference Multinational Executive or Manager Green Card Sponsorship Process

This is a fast track Green Card sponsorship process, typically applicable to those who are already in L-1A visa status. The sponsored employee must have worked for an affiliate of the sponsoring employer abroad in an executive or managerial capacity and then be working in the U.S. for the affiliate in a similar executive or managerial capacity. Employers must complete and file a Form I-140 Immigration petition on behalf of the sponsored employee with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

For further information on these visa principles, please be sure to download and listen to:

Hasta La Visa, Baby Episode 1: Down the Hall and to the Left: Intracompany Transferees and Home Alone 2
In this episode, Shai and Roderick discuss the 1992 holiday blockbuster, Home Alone 2: Lost in New York. In this episode, Shai and Roderick explore the character known as Mr. Hector, played by Tim Curry. Mr. Hector is a UK national, the concierge at the Plaza hotel in New York and one of the main antagonists of Kevin McCallister, played by Macaulay Culkin. Shai and Roderick will attempt to solve what Mr. Hector’s visa status may have been and will provide insight into what type of immigration advice they would give Mr. Hector if he visited them for a consultation.

The visa categories they will explore in this episode include L-1A, L-1B, and the I-140 multinational manager process. Plus, what happens when a hotel concierge gets a little too personal and a few takeaways from one of the “greatest” cameos of all time.

 

 

 

State Department Extends Validity of National Interest Exceptions

The U.S. Department of State has extended the validity of National Interest Exceptions (NIEs) for travelers from China, Iran, India, Brazil, South Africa, the Schengen Area, Ireland and the United Kingdom whose admission to the U.S. is restricted by COVID-related regional travel bans.

Under the new policy, NIEs are now valid for multiple entries during the 12 month period following the date of approval. The policy applies retroactively to NIEs that were previously approved or granted in connection with a visa application. Previously NIEs were valid for one entry within 30 days of approval.

What does this mean for travelers?

Travelers who have been  granted an NIE may be admitted to the U.S. pursuant to the NIE for a period of up to 12 months from the date of approval provided that the travel to the U.S. is consistent with the purpose for which the NIE was originally granted.  If required for the class of admission, the traveler must also have a valid visa along with the NIE.   Travelers without a valid visa will be required to apply for a new visa and a new NIE.

NIE qualifying criteria includes:

  • Providing vital support or executive direction for significant economic activity in the U.S.;
  • Journalism;
  • Travel due to extraordinary humanitarian circumstances; or
  • Travel to support national security or public health.

NIEs have become increasingly difficult to obtain as the U.S. consulates abroad have struggled to meet the demand for consular services due to COVID-related closures, staffing shortages, restrictive qualifying criteria, and backlogged visa and NIE applications. Extending the validity of NIEs, including that of previously issued NIEs, should help to relieve some of the demand for consular services while facilitating critical travel to the U.S.

Gibney is closely monitoring the impact of the new policy and will provide updates as they become available.  For additional information, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

 

 

 

USCIS Issues Policies to Improve Immigration Services: What Employers and Foreign Nationals Need to Know

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced three new policy updates to the USCIS Policy Manual aimed at improving access to immigration benefits. The updated policies:

  • Clarify the criteria for expedited processing of benefit applications;
  • Address guidance regarding Request for Evidence (RFE) and Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) issuance; and,
  • Increase the validity period for initial and renewal employment authorization documents (EADs) for certain noncitizens with pending adjustment of status applications.

These policy initiatives were taken pursuant to  Executive Order (E.O.) 14012, “Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans.” Issued by President Biden on February 2, 2021, the order directs federal agencies to identify strategies to eliminate barriers that impede access to immigration benefits.

What Employers and Foreign Nationals Need to Know

Expedited Processing

Applicants and petitioners may request that USCIS expedite the adjudication of immigration benefit requests even if premium processing is otherwise available for the application. USCIS reviews these requests on a case-by-case basis. The updated expedite policy clarifies the criteria and circumstances under which USCIS will generally consider expedite requests. It restores the ability of nonprofit organizations to request expedited processing if the beneficiary will further U.S. cultural and social interests. It also clarifies that expedited processing for noncitizens pending removal or in removal proceedings is coordinated between USCIS and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Requests for Evidence and Notices of Intent to Deny

The updated RFE and NOID guidance rescinds a Trump-era policy that permitted officers to deny certain benefit requests outright instead of first issuing an RFE or NOID.  The updated guidance instructs officers to issue a RFE or NOID when additional evidence could potentially demonstrate eligibility for an immigration benefit, rather than simply denying the benefit request. This practice helps to ensure that those requesting benefits  have an opportunity to correct simple mistakes or unintentional omissions. This was USCIS policy from 2013 until 2018, when it was rescinded by the Trump Administration. With this action, the 2013 guidance is restored.

Employment Authorization Documents

 

Updated policy guidance increases the validity period for initial and renewal Employment Authorization Document (EADs) from one year to two years for certain adjustment of status applicants. The goal is to significantly lessen the number of employment authorization applications filed with USCIS, allowing USCIS to shift limited resources to other priority areas.

Gibney welcomes these developments and will closely monitor their impact. We will continue to report on additional initiatives to improve and modernize the U.S. immigration system.  For additional information, please contact your designated Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.

DHS Extends Form I-9 Flexibility for Remote Employees to August 31, 2021

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has extended a policy providing employers with flexibility in meeting certain Form I-9 Employment Verification requirements.  The policy, initially implemented in March 2020, relaxes the requirement to review Form I-9 identity and employment verification documents for remote workers “in-person” during the pandemic. The guidance, which was set to expire May 31, 2021, has now  been extended to August 31, 2021.

Who does the Policy Affect?

Form I-9 in-person inspection rules were relaxed for any U.S. employer who converted to a total remote working schedule for all employees due to COVID-19. The policy states that “if there are employees physically present at a work location, no exceptions are being implemented at this time for in-person verification of identity and employment eligibility documentation for Form I-9.“ However, according to the policy, DHS will consider exceptions if newly-hired employees are subject to COVID-19 quarantine or lockdown protocols.

The current extension includes guidance for employees hired on or after June 1, 2021 working exclusively in a remote setting due to COVID-19-related precautions. Those employees are temporarily exempt from the physical inspection requirements associated with the Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) until they undertake non-remote employment on a regular, consistent, or predictable basis, or the extension of the flexibilities related to such requirements is terminated, whichever is earlier.

How Should Qualifying Employers Proceed?

Remote employees must complete Section 1 of Form I-9 and choose identity and work-authorization documents from List A/B/C. Within three (3) business days of hire, remote employers must inspect the employee’s documents over video link, email, fax, etc., and complete Section 2 of Form I-9. Employers must retain copies of any documents inspected remotely. Employers should enter “COVID-19” as the reason for the physical inspection delay in the Section 2 Additional Information field.

After normal operations resume and employees return to the office, employers will have three (3) business days to physically examine the same documents previously reviewed electronically/remotely. Once the documents have been physically inspected, the employer should add “documents physically examined” with the date of inspection to the Section 2 Additional Information field on the Form I-9, or to Section 3, as appropriate.

Qualifying employers who use this option must be prepared to provide DHS with written documentation of their remote onboarding and telework policy. DHS reminds employers that, as a general matter for remote workers (even before the pandemic), a company may designate anyone to serve as an “authorized representative” of the company for completion of Section 2, including the in-person inspection of documents. Rather than relying on the temporary pandemic policy for a remote workforce, an employer may consider utilizing an authorized representative to inspect the employee’s documents in-person with three (3) days of hire, in accordance with pre-existing rules permitting the use of authorized representatives to perform this function. The employer is liable for any violations in connection with the form or the verification process, including any violations in connection with the form or the verification process.

Looking Ahead

Employers should anticipate that DHS will terminate the  flexibility to verify Form I-9 documents virtually  as pandemic restrictions are lifted.  Because employers who have availed themselves of the relaxed rules will have only three (3) business days to physically examine documents when normal operations resume,  employers may wish to designate agents to physically inspect documents now for those hired and verified remotely since March 2020.  Keep in mind, though, as noted above, that employers are liable for any violations or errors made by the designated authorized representative during the verification process.

Gibney is closely monitoring changes to employment eligibility verification policy and procedures and will provide updates as they become available. If you have questions regarding this alert or the Form I-9 process generally, please contact your Gibney representative or email info@gibney.com.